The “Grandfather Clause” Myth: AS 2293.3-2005 vs. 2018 and the Renovation Trigger
Let’s talk about “Frank.” Frank owns a medium-sized commercial building in a capital city. His building was built in 2008, and he’s always been diligent. He gets his Annual Fire Safety Statement (AFSS) done on time, and his building has always been compliant with the standard it was built to: the AS 2293.3-2005 standard.
Now it’s 2025. The office market is tough, and to attract new tenants, he’s planning a major $500,000 renovation for two floors. He’s budgeted for new walls, carpets, and a modern fit-out.
Two weeks into planning, his building certifier drops a bomb: “Frank, because this work requires a Development Application (DA), your ‘grandfathered’ 2005 compliance is void. You must upgrade the entire emergency lighting system on these floors to the current AS/NZS 2293.3:2018 standard.”
Frank’s budget is blown. The “DA Trigger” just cost him tens of thousands of dollars he never saw coming.
This is, without a doubt, the biggest financial shock for owners of existing buildings. They get blindsided by it because they fundamentally misunderstand how compliance works over time. As an expert in this field, let me clear up the myth of the “grandfather clause.”
Let’s Be Clear: AS 2293.3-2005 is Superseded
First, an essential fact. The standard AS 2293.3-2005 is obsolete and superseded.
Any new building work in Australia, from a skyscraper to an office fit-out, is legally bound by the current National Construction Code (NCC).
In the September 2025 quarter alone, $6.39 billion in new non-residential building was approved in Australia. Every single dollar of that work must comply with the 2018/2021 standards. The 2005 standard is history… almost.
The “Grandfather Clause” – What It Really Means
So, is Frank’s building illegal? No. This is where the “grandfather clause” (or “maintaining baseline compliance”) comes in. It’s a very specific, very limited provision.
The “Maintain Baseline” Rule
An existing building, like Frank’s 2008 property, is allowed to maintain its compliance with the standards that were in effect at the time it was built.
This means that for his annual AFSS inspection, the certifier tests the system against the 2005-era rules.
The “Like-for-Like” Replacement Caveat
This “grandfathering” also extends to minor, routine maintenance. If a single 2005-era “D32” spitfire fails, Frank can simply replace that one fitting with a modern, 2018-compliant “D32” fitting.
But this protection is fragile. And Frank is about to shatter it.
The Upgrade Trigger: The Moment You Lodge a Development Application (DA)
Here is the single most important sentence for any existing building owner in Australia:
Your “grandfathered” compliance is valid only until you lodge a Development Application (DA) for major renovations.
The moment you do, the “grandfather clause” evaporates. The council and your building certifier will assess your new work against the current standards.
Why? The Legal Logic Explained
This isn’t a cash grab. It’s a logical legal principle. The National Construction Code (NCC) applies to new building work.
The law sees this as an opportunity to upgrade the building’s safety features to the modern standard, ensuring occupants are protected by the latest safety principles. You can’t build a “new” 2025-era fit-out that relies on 2005-era safety systems.
This “DA Trigger” is the legal mechanism that forces the building stock to be progressively upgraded over time.
Why the Upgrade Matters: 2005 vs. 2018 (What Changed?)
So why is the certifier forcing Frank to upgrade? What’s the big difference? The 13 years between 2005 and 2018 saw the single biggest revolution in lighting history: the dominance of LED technology.
The AS 2293.3-2005 standard
The AS/NZS 2293.3:2018 standard
Here are the technical changes that matter:
- Lumen Depreciation (The Big One): LEDs don’t “burn out” like old bulbs; they just get dimmer over their lifespan.
This is called lumen depreciation. The 2018 standard (specifically Part 1, which relies on Part 3 products) forces designers to account for this. They must use a “lumen depreciation factor” to ensure that an 8-year-old LED fitting still puts 0.2 lux on the floor. The 2005 standard had no such requirement. - Updated Testing Methods: The Part 3 testing methods for LEDs, their complex driver electronics, and their lithium-ion batteries are far more rigorous in the 2018 version.
- End of Light Source Life (LSL): The new standards (specifically Part 2) now have rules for replacing fittings at their “end of light source life” (often 10 years), which simply wasn’t a concept with old fluorescent tubes that were replaced every 1-2 years.
Frank’s certifier is forcing the upgrade because a 2005-era design (which assumed bright, new fluorescent tubes) is no longer a safe or accurate way to measure the performance of a modern LED system over its 10-year life.
Conclusion: Your Next Renovation Is an E&E Upgrade
If you own or manage an “existing” building (pre-2018), do not get caught in Frank’s trap. That “grandfather clause” you’re relying on is a paper shield.
The moment you plan a significant renovation, the very first line item in your capital expenditure (CAPEX) budget should be: “Full Emergency & Exit Lighting Upgrade to AS/NZS 2293:2018.”
Factor it in now. Talk to your fire contractor before you talk to your interior designer. Don’t let the DA Trigger be the $50,000 surprise that sinks your project.
“Get Your Free Building Managers Compliance Kit”
Let’s chat! We’re here to help you create a fire safe space.
Email: service@completepumpsfire.com
Office: (02) 8582 7997
Stay safe, stay connected!
The Team at Complete Pumps and Fire Protection 🧯



